Reviewflowz replies to your reviews by continuing the replies you have already written. Nothing posts automatically until you set a rule that says so.
Here's what that actually means.
The agent writes from the replies you already posted, including the ones you wrote on Google before you had an account here.
An ordered list of rules decides which reviews it answers on its own, and which ones wait for you.
The reviews that wait arrive with the reply already drafted, so approving one is reading and editing, not writing.
Every reply it posts on its own comes back to you, tagged with the agent and the rule that sent it.
Replies aren't metered on a paid plan, and a free trial is enough to hear the agent answer your own reviews in your own voice.
Where the reply comes from
The agent doesn't invent a voice for you. It reads the replies you have already posted and continues them.
That includes replies you wrote directly on Google or Trustpilot years before you had an account here. We read what actually went live on the platform, so a brand new account already has your voice on file.
Here's how one reply gets written. A review comes in, and the agent goes looking for the replies in your history that match it: same brand, same kind of rating, same language, and the same shape, so a bare rating is answered from your replies to other bare ratings and never from your replies to long ones. It picks five to ten, and one becomes the style anchor it mirrors for the opener and the sign off. Then it writes.
So the draft is a continuation of your own writing, not a fresh composition.
One detail worth knowing, because it's what keeps the whole thing from drifting: replies you wrote by hand rank above replies the AI wrote. The more you write yourself, the more of you it has to work from, and it never quietly starts copying itself instead.
That mechanism is unusual. Here is what the other review reply tools actually do:
Tool | How it writes a reply |
Reviewflowz | Continues the replies you have already posted, chosen per review |
GatherUp | Picks from up to 50 responses you write and load in first |
Uberall | Fires one of 20 templates on star rating rules, the first three AI written |
NiceJob | Generates from the review, with tone, voice and length presets |
Consumer Fusion | Builds templates from the sentiment keywords in your reviews |
REVIEWS.io | A free generator you paste a single review into |
None of them claims to learn from the replies you have already posted. That's the difference between a reply that sounds like your business and one that sounds like a template with your name at the bottom.
You can customise the prompt if you have one, and create as many agents as you need. Most clients don't, because the default agent and the RAG system behind it do such a good job of continuing what you have been doing until now. If you do want to go further, there's a guide to the agent's settings and one on writing a good prompt.
There is no training step. When you connect a platform, Reviewflowz reads the replies already published on it, so the first draft is built from your own writing instead of a starter template. If you have been answering reviews by hand for years, that history is what the AI review autoresponder works from on day one.
Deciding what posts on its own, and what waits for you
This is the part worth thinking about properly.
Your replies are governed by an ordered list of rules. Each rule matches some of your reviews and says one of three things: post the reply, hold it for you, or leave it alone. A review runs down the list and stops at the first rule that matches it, so the order is the logic. At the bottom sits a catch all that covers everything nothing else caught.
You scope a rule by location, by review profile, by platform, by star rating, or by whether the review has any text in it. You can run up to twenty. Each one can use a different agent, so a review of your Brighton site can answer in a different voice from your Leeds one.
Here's a set that works for most people:
Five stars, no text, post it. Someone left a bare rating. There's nothing to get wrong.
Four and five stars with text, post it. You already know how to answer these, and you have answered hundreds of them, which is exactly what the agent is working from.
The catch all, hold it for me. Everything three stars and under lands in your queue with a reply already written, and you decide what goes out.
The instinct is to draw the line at a star rating, and that works. But the better test is whether the review is the whole story. If you're already emailing that customer about their complaint, the public reply needs to reference that conversation, and the agent has no way to know it happened. So automate the reviews that explain themselves, and keep the ones that don't.
Rules apply to reviews as they arrive, and a new review is normally answered within the hour. Google Play caps replies at 350 characters, which is handled for you: drafts aim at 320 and anything longer gets condensed before it goes out.
To set this up:
Connect the platform you want to answer on. For Google that means connecting your Google Business Profile, and replies won't post on Site Manager access alone.
Open Replies in your settings and add your first rule.
Pick what it matches, then pick post, hold, or ignore.
Leave the catch all on hold until you've watched a few go out.
A writing aid drafts one review at a time, while you are sitting in front of it. Rules run without you: a review is matched, answered and posted while you are elsewhere, and the ones you chose to hold are waiting when you get back. That is the difference between a writing aid and reply automation, which is on Pro and above.
Approving everything else
The reviews you didn't automate aren't the old job.
Open a review in your queue and the reply is already there. It generates as the card loads, on its own priority lane, so it's written by the time you've finished reading the review. From there:
Read it. Most of the time it's right, because it's built from what you already wrote.
Edit anything you want changed, or hit regenerate for a different pass.
Post it. It goes straight to the platform, with no second approval step.
You can do all of that without opening the app. On Slack and Microsoft Teams the review arrives as a card with a reply button, the answer prefills, and submitting posts it. It works from your phone too.
What you see after it posts
Every reply the agent posts on its own comes back to you.
It collects in the Unread view of your reply queue, tagged with the agent and the rule that sent it, so you can always see why a given review got answered the way it did. Give it a thumbs up and it clears. Give it a thumbs down and you can say what was wrong with it.
The reply also comes back to wherever the review arrived. On Slack it posts as a reply in the same thread as the original alert, and on Teams it threads under the review card, so the person who saw the review sees the answer without going looking for it.
Good to know:
Google moderates replies before they appear, usually within about ten minutes.
The reviewer gets notified when you reply, and can update their review afterwards.
An auto posted reply is a normal reply. You can edit it after the fact like any other.
Which platforms it posts to
Five platforms take a reply straight from Reviewflowz. On the rest, the reply is written for you and you post it, with a link that opens the right page.
Platform | Posts directly | Reply written for you |
Yes | Yes | |
App Store | Yes | Yes |
Google Play | Yes | Yes |
Trustpilot | Yes | Yes |
Yes | Yes | |
Tripadvisor | No | Yes |
Yelp, G2, Capterra and others | No | Yes |
Each of the five needs its integration connected first. The app stores and Tripadvisor have their own guides, and every platform we support is listed separately.
What it costs
Replies aren't metered. You're not buying credits and the price doesn't move with your review volume.
AI replies | |
Pro and above | Unlimited, drafted and posted |
Free trial | 20 posted replies, drafts unlimited |
Chrome extension, free | 3 a day |
Chrome extension, on trial | 10 a day |
Reply rules, custom agents and the reply queue are all on Pro and above, and a free trial unlocks all three. The last two rows are a different product: the Chrome extension writes replies inside Google Business Profile Manager, on its own daily allowance.
Pricing is per location, so it does not move with your review volume. An account answering forty reviews a month and an account answering four thousand pay the same. The pricing page lists what each plan includes.
Three questions everyone asks
Does Google allow AI written replies? Yes. Google's content policy for Maps doesn't mention AI at all. Its fake engagement rules police invented experiences, not who typed the words, and there is no separate standard for the reply a business writes back. Don't confuse this with AI generated reviews, which are a different thing and are against policy.
Will people be able to tell? They can tell a template. A 2026 study in the Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research found that templated AI replies measurably reduce trust, while AI replies that engage with the review are indistinguishable from human ones. BrightLocal's 2026 survey points the same way: generic responses make half of consumers less likely to choose a business. The penalty attaches to sounding generic, not to using AI, and Google's own guidance asks you to personalise your reply rather than to write it yourself.
What about the reviews I already have? Rules apply to reviews as they come in, so turning one on doesn't touch your back catalogue. If you want your existing reviews answered, contact support and we'll take care of it for you.
What to do next
Start a free trial and connect one platform. Put your five star reviews on a rule, leave everything else on hold, and read what the agent drafts. That's the only test that settles it.
Reviewflowz starts at $45 per location per month, and the trial runs fourteen days with no card. Set up automatic replies when you're ready, or read the plan comparison first.




